Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web Share Target API (#221)

Oh, and a final comment related to registries:  it seems like there ought to be a master list somewhere of the extensions to WebAppManifest (and, for that matter, other uses of WebIDL `partial`) so that we don't end up with conflicting ones.  (That's particularly interesting in this case given our [discussion](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/127#issuecomment-278789026) about preserving the ability for the [origin policy](https://wicg.github.io/origin-policy/) and the [web app manifest](https://w3c.github.io/manifest/) being the same file.)  That's sort of the risk of `partial`... but eventually shouldn't these extensions get rolled back into the original spec so people can keep track of them?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/221#issuecomment-358147565

Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2018 23:55:19 UTC