[w3c/ServiceWorker] Spec of Service Worker state (#1256)

In the [`2.1. Service Worker`](https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#service-worker-concept) section, the spec said 

> A service worker has an associated _**state**_, which is one of _parsed_, _installing_, _installed_, _activating_, _activated_, and _redundant_. It is initially _**parsed**_.

However, in its interface specification which is [`3.1. ServiceWorker`](https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#serviceworker-interface) section, it said

```rust
enum ServiceWorkerState {
  "installing",
  "installed",
  "activating",
  "activated",
  "redundant"
};
```

> A **ServiceWorker** object has an associated **ServiceWorkerState** object which is itself associated with **service worker's state**.

If the **ServiceWorkerState** is associated to **service worker's state**, I think maybe one of them is incorrect?
Maybe the **parsed** is redundant now?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1256

Received on Monday, 1 January 2018 13:26:55 UTC