Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Support `Response` in `URL.createObjectURL` (#97)

@guest271314 

> Not gathering what the issue is or what `Response` in `URL.createObjectURL` means. What are you trying to achieve?

I am trying to implement code transformation for a variety of use cases in the browser. Adding `Response` as a backing entry for `blob:` URLs would expand the capabilities of `blob:` URLs to include a variety of new ways, but the expansion itself is not the main goal.

> If interpret the issue and use case correctly are you trying to export and import a `Blob URL`?

I am importing a `blob:` URL in order to work around limitations of preprocessing steps and service workers in order to get the code transformation use case satisfied. I am not tied specifically to using `blob:`, but this use case of transforming ESM loading beyond service worker capabilities seems to not be seen as a use case by others.

I think there is opposition in the comments above about what a use case is and I am frustrated because there is no clear place to move forwards, so I will just have to keep opening issues in various places to see if the use case is valid given the context of where I open feature requests.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/FileAPI/issues/97#issuecomment-366759187