Re: [heycam/webidl] Consider syntactic changes to WebIDL to make it more "JavaScript-y" (#485)

(We could probably leave named constructors as an interface extended attribute, since they're legacy anyway. Or additionally add some way to indicate that a method is a constructor, and then just define named constructors as methods on Window or whatever.)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/485#issuecomment-449150853

Received on Thursday, 20 December 2018 22:07:54 UTC