Re: [heycam/webidl] Consider syntactic changes to WebIDL to make it more "JavaScript-y" (#485)

I'm sorry that I don't have a handy public reference.  But I remember that some people wanted to make some constructors [[RuntimeEnabled=FEATURE_NAME]](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/IDLExtendedAttributes.md#RuntimeEnabled_i_m_a_c), which is a Blink-specific extended attribute.  With this extended attribute, we can enable a certain experimental constructor only for those who explicitly opt-in the experiment.  We somehow managed it with a hack instead of the extended attribute in past, that was painful and unfortunate.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/485#issuecomment-448574093

Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2018 12:16:01 UTC