- From: Boris Zbarsky <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:57:48 +0000 (UTC)
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2018 13:58:10 UTC
Just to chime in on a pure implementation level, right now webidl has various scopes that constrain name resolution (toplevel, dictionary, interface) and all those scopes map to reasonable syntactic constructs. Introducing scopes that don't map to a simple syntactic construct would lead to some amount of parser implementation complexity which may not be warranted... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/592#issuecomment-448229255
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2018 13:58:10 UTC