Re: [heycam/webidl] Is step 4 of the effective overload set construction unnecessary? (#600)

So specifically, this is to handle IDL like:

    void foo(int... arg);

when called as `foo(1, 2)`.  In this case, _N_ is 2, _maxarg_ is 1.  But we do in fact want `S` to end up containing a signature with two arguments, because we want to pass both arguments to the underlying implementation.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/600#issuecomment-447954748