Re: [whatwg/dom] MutationObserver invocation order (#713)

@FremyCompany I think you're correct that the specification leaks memory. And I'd accept a PR that addresses it or a new issue for the backlog. However, I'll note that we haven't formalized strong/weak references and typically assume infinite resources, so the problem I'd like to keep this issue focused on are the web observable differences.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/713#issuecomment-446256433

Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2018 16:02:32 UTC