Re: [heycam/webidl] Consider syntactic changes to WebIDL to make it more "JavaScript-y" (#485) from Boris Zbarsky on 2018-12-08 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from December 2018)

From: Boris Zbarsky <notifications@github.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2018 07:26:15 -0800
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/issues/485/445467044@github.com>

I think things like:

    void foo(long "optional");

would look a little weird...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/485#issuecomment-445467044

Received on Saturday, 8 December 2018 15:26:36 UTC