- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 05:49:01 -0700
- To: whatwg/xhr <xhr@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2018 12:49:34 UTC
That seems reasonable. I think it's the right strategy, but we don't want to burden spec maintainers with comprehensive tests and block all forward spec progress until they're done. The reason I prefer being more comprehensive than a single test is that if a browser parses-then-reserializes using some XHR-specific parser, a single test might not catch a difference, depending on the algorithm. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/xhr/pull/176#issuecomment-380439707
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2018 12:49:34 UTC