Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611)

I'll note that there are a few breaking changes if we do this: 

1. enums are case sensitive, so orientation and display modes values could break in web content.
1. We wouldn't trim anymore (as you noted earlier) - I think that's fine, IMO.

We should check if the above would break a lot of web content. I doubt it will. 

FWIW, I think it's worth doing this - if only because it gets rid of so much redundancy. But then again... I'm not sure how we reconcile the JSON naming vs DOM API naming issues.  


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/611#issuecomment-332735824

Received on Thursday, 28 September 2017 05:59:56 UTC