If you didn't miss that point, why did you say: > Doesn't claiming the method name now potentially leave us with a more difficult naming issue in future? This API is explicitly for decoding the data (to be) hold by the `img` element. If we later get an API that decodes image data into `ImageBitmap` objects or some such it would live somewhere else and I don't really see how confusion could arise. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/182#issuecomment-332455558
Received on Wednesday, 27 September 2017 08:55:26 UTC