Re: [w3c/workers] Should Shared Workers be removed? (#2)

Due to usage in the wild, this doesn't seem like something that is feasible unless there is something that can replace the usecase of shared workers. (Service Workers unfortunately doesn't cover every surface that shared workers can deal with, so that isn't a immediate alternative.) 

-- 
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/workers/issues/2#issuecomment-337798659