- From: Tantek Çelik <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 14:37:18 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2017 14:38:14 UTC
@torgo re: "On this point, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986 would be the correct normative reference." why not https://url.spec.whatwg.org/ instead which I believe more and more W3C RECs are citing. E.g. https://www.w3.org/TR/webmention/#normative-references and https://www.w3.org/TR/websub/#normative-references -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/201#issuecomment-337251550
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2017 14:38:14 UTC