Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] resurrected service workers don't fire an activate event which may break expectations (#1204)

I think that makes sense, this is a hard edge case for many developers to reason about. I do think that if we fire 'activate' again that we probably want to fire 'install' again too. I could see developers getting confused about 'activate' firing in this case but not 'install'.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1204#issuecomment-334868703

Received on Friday, 6 October 2017 21:05:24 UTC