- From: Jake Archibald <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:59:50 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1229/review/77789614@github.com>
jakearchibald requested changes on this pull request.
This is a good step, but eventually I'd like to replace the whole "job" concept with a parallel queue.
> @@ -257,6 +257,14 @@ spec: webappsec-referrer-policy; urlPrefix: https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-refe
Note: A user agent may use a separate task source for each functional event type in order to avoid a head-of-line blocking phenomenon for certain functional events.
</section>
+ <section>
+ <h3 id="user-agent-bootup">User Agent Boot up</h3>
+
+ A user agent has an associated <dfn export id="dfn-service-worker-manager">service worker manager</dfn>.
+
+ A user agent *must* [=start a new parallel queue=] when it boots up and set the [=service worker manager=] to the result value.
Does this need to be scoped to the whole user agent, or is per-origin enough?
>
Note: For a register job and an update job, the user agent delays queuing a task for running the job until after a {{Document/DOMContentLoaded}} event has been dispatched to the document that initiated the job.
- 1. Else if |job|'s [=job type=] is *unregister*, run [=Unregister=] with |job| [=in parallel=].
+ 1. Else if |job|'s [=job type=] is *unregister*, run [=Unregister=] with |job|.
This is a good step. Eventually I'd like to get rid of the "job" concept entirely, and replace it with appending steps to the appropriate parallel queue.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1229#pullrequestreview-77789614
Received on Monday, 20 November 2017 14:00:23 UTC