Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695)

Is it a correct read of their proposal to say the only changes to HTML itself they're proposing are new attributes to `<template>` like `type`, `directive`, and `expression` and that the only connection to mustache in the proposal is simply that the example values they gave for those attributes are mustache-inspired (e.g. "foreach") rather than standardizing on mustache syntax itself?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/695#issuecomment-344136869