Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Do not specify template binding syntax in spec, make configurable (#697)

At TPAC, all participants in the discussion that spoke up agreed that we should decide on a standardized syntax. Note that we did not insist on double-curlies, but did insist on nothing that would require escaping when using in conjunction with CSS or JS. (So, single-curlies and dollar-curlies are no good.)

Given @rniwa's good reasons above, let's close this, as we can be pretty confident the proposal will not end up with configurable syntax.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/697#issuecomment-344128384

Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:43:00 UTC