- From: Eric Newport <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:59:20 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:59:43 UTC
I guess what I don't get is why is this from Apple's proposal substantively less difficult to standardize on: ```html <template type="with-for-each" id="list"> <ul> {{foreach items}} <li class={{class}} data-value={{value}}>{{label}}</li> {{/foreach}} </ul> </template> ``` Than something like this? ```html <template id="list"> <ul> <loop through="items" val="item"> <li class={item.class} data-value={item.value}>{item.label}</li> </loop> </ul> </template> ``` In both cases, an arbitrary templating syntax is being invented separate and apart from the current HTML spec and only parsed within `<template>` elements. Why would making the syntax used for that HTML-like or HTML-inspired be significantly more difficult than just using mustache or similar? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/695#issuecomment-344121155
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:59:43 UTC