Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695)

Another option could be extending native elements (templates, in this case). Ironically, Apple vetoed the "is" attribute for extension; I understand the reasoning (somewhat) but this makes more sense to me in this particular context:

```html
<template is="if">
<template is="repeat">
```

Where each of the templates are template derivatives (could be "native" or custom elements).


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/695#issuecomment-343917674