Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: pass custom params in ServiceWorkerRegistration for future use (#1157)

Closing this.

I wish we could just spec async localstorage, but I guess once you add something to handle concurrency issues, you're right back at IDB.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1157#issuecomment-341689684

Received on Friday, 3 November 2017 12:26:50 UTC