- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 12:57:37 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2017 20:58:09 UTC
Right; my suggestion was not *seriously* that I use a pair iterator, just that using a pair iterator is the best current solution to my problem; it does exactly what I want (at least, the minimal form of "what I want"), and what value iterators apparently *originally* did before they were broken for weird reasons. Thus "this is, obviously, dumb as hell". "because you don't think it's your responsibility" is a very unkind reading of my words; I explained in significantly more detail why I'm not dropping my other work to spin myself up to add a pretty non-trivial new feature to WebIDL. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/291#issuecomment-284856539
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2017 20:58:09 UTC