Re: [heycam/webidl] Allow iterable objects without having to become fake arrays (or fix spec) (#325)

The checking of values can be done by IDL's `sequence<>`, no?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/325#issuecomment-283918958

Received on Friday, 3 March 2017 10:24:17 UTC