Re: [w3c/touch-events] Clarify cancelability during scroll (#79)

Yeah, in Gecko we don't fire the touch events at all. But putting this in the spec seems like a good clarification.

I think the "may not" wording could be improved though - usually "may not" means that it shouldn't happen (e.g. "you may not go the washroom") but in this case what you're trying to say is that the browser might "not suspend the motion of an element". I suggest rewording to either:
... User Agents may continue the motion ...
... User Agents might not suspend the motion ...
(or something else).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/touch-events/pull/79#issuecomment-283800142

Received on Thursday, 2 March 2017 22:17:56 UTC