Re: [w3c/webcomponents] HTML Modules (#645)

Thanks for getting a public discussion going, @justinfagnani! I see HTML Modules as being a good container format for achieving generic subresource dependency specification. They solve my need for platform-level colocated `<template>`, `<style>` and `<script>`/Module in a similar style to what I would get with something like Vue's .vue files or Polymer's existing HTML Imports.

One question I would ask is what it is about HTML Modules that makes them specific to Web Components? If a third-party decides to just use HTML + CSS + JS in this container format, that should just work too right?

I'm also interested in where we see HTML Modules fitting with respect to the semi-related Web Packaging efforts.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/645#issuecomment-309805753