- From: Boris Zbarsky <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 23:06:58 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2017 06:07:33 UTC
> Is the crux of argument in [[DefineOwnProperty]]'s step 2.2 Yes. > Where, in second call to Object.defineProperty in your example, neither of the conditions in this clause hold? Yes. > I took that to mean (now I feel foolish for this interpretation) that meant non-named getter properties Hmm. If we define it that way, things do work ok, I think. We should make that _very_ clear in IDL, though! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/366#issuecomment-306696052
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2017 06:07:33 UTC