- From: snuggs <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 12:57:20 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 24 July 2017 12:57:44 UTC
> application/ecmascript is one of them ZOMG 🙏 💛 💜 @annevk thank you so much for this reference. I've mentioned about `application/ecmascript` and had actually gotten shunned before in the `whatwg/dom` or `html` issue tracker for that not being a valid mme type. As if the RFC4392 wasn't enough. This was my missing link i've been looking for for ages. Thanks @annevk -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/645#issuecomment-317414130
Received on Monday, 24 July 2017 12:57:44 UTC