- From: raymeskhoury <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 04:30:25 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 6 July 2017 04:31:03 UTC
> @raymeskhoury pushed for a "reactive" API instead. I think you mean proactive API here? > I assumed the two API styles were mutually exclusive I think it's a bit fuzzy but I think if I squint I can see additional coverage we might get by simulating some kind of prompting behavior in the UA. However, in practice I don't see a reactive API being very valuable to test writers in the presence of a proactive one and potentially just causing confusion. My thought is that we shouldn't spend the time specifying/implementing that behavior for now. If a clear need comes along we can dig deeper. WDYT? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/153#issuecomment-313292291
Received on Thursday, 6 July 2017 04:31:03 UTC