Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Review of WakeLock API and suitability for overall platform requested by 31 August 2016 (#126) from Dominique Hazael-Massieux on 2017-01-13 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from January 2017)

From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <notifications@github.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 02:25:47 -0800
To: w3ctag/spec-reviews <spec-reviews@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/126/272410465@github.com>

The API has been reworked in depth by its editor @andrey-logvinov based on the feedback from the TAG - we would appreciate if the TAG could take another look at it to see if this is getting in a more promising direction: https://w3c.github.io/wake-lock/

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/126#issuecomment-272410465

Received on Friday, 13 January 2017 10:26:22 UTC