Re: [heycam/webidl] Describing overloaded methods (#241)

If you don't care much I might just try to work with whatever Bikeshed decided on. I guess it'll all be moot anyway if we get to a place where IDL generates the name of the abstract operation the specification has to define (i.e., peak formalism).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/241#issuecomment-271795493

Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2017 07:13:06 UTC