- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:56:19 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2017 02:56:53 UTC
> Yeah, "wait until-but-also-wait-an-extra-turn" the argument is the original problem statement and the behavior people agreed on. With your comment, I sort of come to think of again whether this was a right decision but would like to settle on what we decided. Yep, that's fair; I totally understand. > For the spec wording, which of the following would be better? IMO `Upon fulfillment or rejection of promise, queue a task to decrease event’s pending promises count by one.` is the best combination of brevity and using well-defined terms. We should maybe define "upon fulfillment" but currently we don't. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1049#issuecomment-271764372
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2017 02:56:53 UTC