Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509) from Andrea Giammarchi on 2017-02-21 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from February 2017)

From: Andrea Giammarchi <notifications@github.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 01:18:14 -0800
To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webcomponents/issues/509/281287384@github.com>

@treshugart I know what are decorators and [how to use them](https://github.com/WebReflection/universal-mixin#universal-mixin-), but indeed these are something always deliverable in user-land, DOM APIs aren't.

I'm also concerned about possible polyfills, if we have unpolyfillable features, we need transpilers, and transpilers can have bugs that make the feature unusable (e.g. [extending native classes](https://github.com/babel/babel/issues/4480))

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/509#issuecomment-281287384

Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2017 09:18:48 UTC