Re: [whatwg/url] Is failure ever not a syntax violation? (#219)

The entire point of this issue is to remove the need to flag it everywhere and keep it in sync. If we can do that in any way, then I'm happy. Otherwise it's just buggy, as I pointed out in the IPv4 parser case, and I'm going to need to make whatwg-url depart from the spec to avoid the maintenance cost.

Another example solution would be to define "fail" to mean "validation error, return failure" and then use that everywhere you currently use "return failure".

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/219#issuecomment-278988352