Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Shadow] Slotting indirect children (#574)

Hey guys, what do you think of something like #576? It is more explicit, although it would also mean that some element could arbitrarily throw content into some other element's shadow root.

Is that okay? Or does limiting it to shadow root of an ancestor make more sense?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/574#issuecomment-249915350