- From: Michael[tm] Smith <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 06:09:31 -0700
- To: w3ctag/spec-reviews <spec-reviews@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 13:10:46 UTC
> had some discussion with @sideshowbarker about editor's training. Adding him into this loop. I have nothing to add at this point other than to say, Yeah we need to produce some guidelines docs for spec editors in WGs (along with guidelines docs for test writers in WGs). I guess we (at least @plh and I) just need to put a more concrete plan/timeline behind it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/136#issuecomment-249859735
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 13:10:46 UTC