Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Provide a simple synchronous k-v storage for ServiceWorker? (#981)

Why is synchronous calling desirable? Is this something that `await` solves
already, or at least will solve once IDB exposes promises?

On Sep 25, 2016 01:16, "Jake Archibald" <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> @upsuper <https://github.com/upsuper> IDB is definately available in
> service workers.
>
> I agree with 2 in general, but we're talking < 500 bytes here.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/981#issuecomment-249409174>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAD3R6mDkMK3bf7sfhMqD9MzkVUn1xHiks5qti3NgaJpZM4KFnKD>
> .
>


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/981#issuecomment-249422913