- From: Jake Archibald <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:30:20 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/980/248920422@github.com>
We decided that background sync can only be called when there's a document open on the origin. This prevents one-off background sync being turned into a periodic sync by recalling sync inside a sync event. We'll want something similar for background fetch, but it'd be nice to be able to start a download in response to a push message. I wonder if we can fix all these things with the same mechanism. When we create an extendable event, we can assign an expiry time to it. * A fetch event gets an expiry time of x minutes * A `postMessage` sent by a client with an associated document (so a document or a worker linked to a document) gets an expiry time of x minutes * A `postMessage` sent by a service worker A to service worker B gets an expiry time equal to the longest expiry time currently holding service worker A open This means two service workers post messaging each other can only stay alive for a total of 5 minutes. If we're tagging extendable events like this, we can also say things like "background sync can only be used if the SW is being held open by a push/fetch event". Too crazy? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/980#issuecomment-248920422
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2016 14:31:04 UTC