Re: [heycam/webidl] Namespace is a misnomer, should we fix it? (#177)

Well, granted we'll end-up adding attributes and the like, this will eventually be on feature-parity with interfaces minus the this-bounding, no? Why not call it `unbound_interface` in that case, or add the unbound keyword so you have `unbound interface { ... };`?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/177#issuecomment-248864276