Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is <slot> a replaced element or not? (#564)

Thanks! Then, I propose that `<slot>` should not be a replaced element, unless there is an objection.

Regarding the current behavior in Blink, please do not take it seriously. No explicit intention there.
The current support of `<slot>` in Blink is incomplete because Blink does not support "slot" in a flat tree.
See https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/308 for details.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/564#issuecomment-246925446

Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2016 07:10:16 UTC