Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Specify interaction between transaction abort and index/object store renames (#89)

Also, to be clear, I can imagine why an implementation would exhibit the current behavior. I was just stating that the spec explanation for the behavior becomes a bit more complicated, as some parts of the metadata get reverted, but others don't.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/89#issuecomment-245469583