Re: [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83)

@jyasskin if we can't unconfuse ourselves, it may be better to drop it until we find something to do that's not confusing.

What I said at the beginning was that I wanted to have an algorithm that I could reference from the getUserMedia procedure description, so that I didn't have to define in getusermedia what the details of the interactions with permission was.

We have that. We may be better off not adding an API for it.





-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/83#issuecomment-244445997