Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509)

I never thought so much about "interpreting" vs "writing with". The `is=""`
attribute is better when interpreting HTML (it could possibly help someone
figure out what to `grep` for more easily), but class-names-as-tag-names
are nicer when writing HTML (assuming knowledge of the [Custom Element's]
API.)

On Nov 8, 2016 5:38 PM, "Ole Ersoy" <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> And I thought I was drinking too much espresso. Anyways if you want to
> comment on something I said feel free to paste quote it.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/509#issuecomment-259313200>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AASKzpkcF2vXZg3q0hdYRUhJYsKdTVb_ks5q8SPNgaJpZM4Iq2sA>
> .
>


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/509#issuecomment-259318087