Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509)

Your data doesn't reflect this thread since you are basically the only one that keeps saying `is` has no use cases while everyone else already described use cases. I name `template` and you ignore it.

I name `tr` and you ignore it. I can name `form` and you ignore it. Graceful enhancement means a basic layout works in style and funcitonality even without JS but then you can enrich it through JS.

`html` is a unique tag and for a singel page app it makes perfect sense to use it as cusom element and enrich capabilities asynchronously as soon as the JS is downloaded in a non blocking way ... but you ignore it.

So I think it's clear there's nothing ou are looking for, you just want to keep stating your point of view. Yeah, we got it, you don't have the need for `is` while the 80% of developers in here do.

Polymer used `is` for long time and successfully too so you also have production cases to consider ... but you won't, and I'm done here.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/509#issuecomment-258903443