Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184)

@smaug---- thanks for the feedback.  we are also concerned about compatibility of existing pages embedded in shadow iframes.  So 3.2 is not a viable option for us, though with 3.1 some implementation difficulties are foreseen as you wrote.

@rniwa any opinions or ideas?

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/184#issuecomment-220521756

Received on Friday, 20 May 2016 05:40:47 UTC