Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] CSP (#42)

Hey Mike,

Overall this looks like a reasonable evolution for CSP; switching to fetch seems very sane.

The extensibility also looks reasonable. It's good to see that there are multiple implementations of the full level 2 spec (at least according to caniuse; is that correct?); it'd be even better to see Firefox get up to speed...

I'm still concerned about the overall size of CSP headers, as well as its uptake by sites. I think there may be a *much* bigger discussion of what our stance to securing the Web should be lurking in that latter point, but that shouldn't hold this up.

One nit - You need to update the IANA registry entries for all of the affected directives in the IANA Considerations section.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/42#issuecomment-219970496

Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2016 09:16:13 UTC