Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Alternative proposal for closed shadow DOM (#499)

@annevk so what you are saying, is that the implementors' input trumps the input of users?

As pointed out https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/354#issuecomment-178498561 the consensus you talk about was never documented. In other words, you did not follow W3C process and give others an opportunity to voice their concerns.

I also notice that none of you have commented on my summary of the arguments https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/499#issuecomment-219111561, I assume because it is pointing out how weak the pro-position actually is. The benefits of this proposal are minuscule, yet their impact in terms of things that break and implementation cost is huge.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/499#issuecomment-219416942