Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Alternative proposal for closed shadow DOM (#499)

@dylanb that implementations are imperfect does not mean the feature is broken. False equivalence.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/499#issuecomment-219039616

Received on Friday, 13 May 2016 13:16:53 UTC