- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 06:41:25 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2016 13:41:57 UTC
A note is preferred since we should only have one normative IDL statement for each thing. I'm not sure if IDL makes it a formal error, but it probably should for such duplication. Mixin would replace the `[NoInterfaceObject]` construct to make it a little bit more obvious what is going on. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/249#issuecomment-218760430
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2016 13:41:57 UTC