Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Alternative proposal for closed shadow DOM (#499)

@rniwa the fact that authors used the shadow piercing combinators should have been a clue to the blink developers that maybe there is a need here that is not being met. Removing a feature, because it gets used "too much" seems to me to be the exact antithesis of agile, UX-based development.

This is precisely the problem with this part of the spec, and more broadly with the HTML spec. It is too dominated by the browser vendors opinions and not focussed on the needs of the users.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/499#issuecomment-218743388