Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Alternative proposal for closed shadow DOM (#499) from Dylan Barrell on 2016-05-12 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from May 2016)

From: Dylan Barrell <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 02:53:18 -0700
To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Cc:
Message-ID: <w3c/webcomponents/issues/499/218711555@github.com>

Is all of the effort to try to patch all of the supposed "leaks" of information about the closed shadow DOM, plus all of the other changes to specs and implementations (e.g. webdriver) really worth the questionable benefits of the writer of some component, trying to stop the users of that component from being idiots?

My experience shows that idiots will be idiots, regardless of how much you try to stop them from doing it, and in this case, the only people that get "hurt" are the idiots. So why all the effort?

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/499#issuecomment-218711555

Received on Thursday, 12 May 2016 09:53:45 UTC